So packaging, transportation and what we could
call supplier engagement. Is there any other place
that would be good to look for alignment with
sustainability issues? Are there any opportunities, say, in marketing?
Yes, and here’s a great example: Natura [Cosméticos
SA], in Brazil. Natura sells creams and other cosmetic products to Brazilian and now European and
U. S. markets.
Natura has a product that’s made from a special
nut from the Amazon jungle. And that nut is only
harvested at certain times in the year.
Now, that cream is a bestseller, and it would be
great for them if they had it all year long. But this is
where marketing can really align with sustainability. The fact is, if the company tries to offer the
product year-round, it’s going to have to force a
change to the natural cycle of the Amazon jungle.
The other option is to let customers know that this
cream is tied to the season. The message is that
making the cream available in the off season would
involve chopping things down and we’d all rather
keep the environment as pristine as possible. The
price that everyone pays is not having the product
all year long but only for three or four months at
whatever quantities we can get.
All of this can only happen when the marketing
and sales organization communicates with the customer and lets them know that everyone has to
adapt to be more sustainable. You have to talk to the
customer, so marketing becomes a big piece of
product strategy, right alongside of supply chain
realities. If you have customer alignment, then you
have more flexibility to pursue sustainability.
Customer alignment, marketing and product
strategy, as a piece.
Yes. If you have that alignment, then you can start
exploring new directions. If you only think from
the constrained view of your current products, you
are bound by that relationship.
The people in the supply chain are uniquely positioned to be able to see the whole ecology of a
company’s business, because they’re so close to
all the pieces in the system, yes?
I wholeheartedly agree with that statement. At
Chiquita [Brands International Inc.], for example,
the supply chain organization is taking the lead in
sustainability.
You know, I was reading this morning about the
big debate about the [proposed] Cape Cod [Massa-chusetts] wind farm. There were two people talking,
and one of them was saying, “I don’t want these
wind farms, because the view will not be as nice and,
well, maybe there’s some disruption to the wildlife.”
Somebody else said something like, “If I know
that for every kilowatt-hour that the farm generates
we will not have a miner in Colombia die, or one
less soldier protecting an oil field, this discussion is
trivial.” Yeah, you sacrifice your view a little bit, but
you’re saving lives.
Imagine that discussion in the supply chain. I’ll
use an example from Starbucks [Corp.], because it’s
spot on. They said they always knew that they sometimes brewed too much coffee. Brewed it then threw
it away. Costwise, it doesn’t look like too much. But
if you trace the coffee back, what it represents really
is wasted work by a farmer in Guatemala.
If you could see that, then you suddenly start
saying this waste is very expensive.
Does that represent an opportunity?
A major opportunity. Especially if you let the consumer know, because the consumer has a stake in
this. Starbucks is doing something very clever. They
say, you know what? We are not going to brew a variety of coffees after 2 p.m. We’ll more efficiently
use up just one type. If a customer comes in and
wants something we’ve stopped brewing, we will
ask them, please wait a little bit, because I’m going
to brew one cup for you. And they have a special
machine now to brew one cup. Simple as that.
Once you see the total cost of an item, and really
think of all the things that took place to get it to you,
then you start looking at waste and environmental
impact and carbon footprint through a different
optic. That’s a conversation you can have with the
customer. I had no idea, but if I am told that throwing out one of those batches of coffee translates to
six months’ work for a farmer, I will gladly be willing
to wait one more minute for them to brew my cup.
Reprint 51401. For ordering information, see page 10.
Copyright © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2010.